• editor.aipublications@gmail.com
  • Track Your Paper
  • Contact Us
  • ISSN: 2582-9823

International Journal Of Language, Literature And Culture(IJLLC)

Frankenstein and the Politics of Embodiment: A Disability Studies Perspective

Debalina Banerjee


International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture (IJLLC), Vol-2,Issue-2, March - April 2022, Pages 25-26, 10.22161/ijllc.2.2.6

Download | Downloads : 4 | Total View : 774

Article Info: Received: 15 Mar 2022, Received in revised form: 11 Apr 2022, Accepted: 20 Apr 2022, Available online: 30 Apr 2022

Cite this Article: APA | ACM | Chicago | Harvard | IEEE | MLA | Vancouver | Bibtex

Share

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) has long been read as a cautionary tale of scientific overreach, moral responsibility, and the gothic sublime. However, within the framework of disability studies, the novel acquires a different resonance. It emerges as a foundational text that interrogates the construction of monstrosity, the social marginalization of non-normative bodies, and the ethical limits of human experimentation. This article explores Frankenstein as a literary case study that challenges dominant narratives around ability, normalcy, and personhood. Through a critical re-examination of the Creature’s embodied experience and Victor Frankenstein’s scientific ambition, the novel can be understood as a proto-critical disability narrative that questions the very grounds on which the human is defined.

Disability, Monstrosity, Marginalization, Personhood, Experimentation.

[1] Davis, Lennard J. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. Verso, 1995.
[2] Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. Staring: How We Look. Oxford UP, 2009.
[3] Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. Edited by Maurice Hindle, Penguin Classics, 2003.