[1] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden, Routledge, 1922.
[2] Anscombe, G. E. M. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Hutchinson, 1959.
[3] Monk, Ray. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. Penguin Books, 1990.
[4] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, 4th ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
[5] Stern, David G. “The Significance of Wittgenstein’s Nachlass for Contemporary Philosophy.” The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, edited by Oskari Kuusela and Marie McGinn, Oxford UP, 2011, pp. 55–81.
[6] Kenny, Anthony. Wittgenstein. Harvard UP, 1973.
[7] Russell, Bertrand. “Introduction.” Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Ludwig Wittgenstein, Routledge, 1922, pp. ix–xxi.
[8] Hacker, P. M. S. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Rev. ed., Clarendon Press, 1986.
[9] Baker, Gordon P. Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects. Edited by Katherine J. Morris, Blackwell, 2004.
[10] Conant, James. “The Method of the Tractatus.” From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy, edited by Erich H. Reck, Oxford UP, 2002, pp. 373–440.
[11] Diamond, Cora. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. MIT Press, 1991.
[12] Kuusela, Oskari. The Struggle Against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy. Harvard UP, 2008.
[13] Kuusela, Oskari. Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy: Re-examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford UP, 2019.
[14] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Bergen Electronic Edition of Wittgenstein’s Nachlass. Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, Oxford UP, 2000.
[15] Pichler, Alois. “Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: The Bergen Electronic Edition and Its Significance.” Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy, edited by Alois Pichler and Simo Säätelä, ontos verlag, 2006, pp. 11–24.
[16] Glock, Hans-Johann. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Blackwell, 1996.
[17] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. “A Lecture on Ethics.” The Philosophical Review, vol. 74, no. 1, 1965, pp. 3–12.
[18] Sluga, Hans. Wittgenstein. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
[19] Candlish, Stewart. The Russell/Bradley Dispute and Its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
[20] Floyd, Juliet. “Wittgenstein on 2×2×2…: The Opening of the Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.” Synthese, vol. 87, no. 1, 1991, pp. 143–80.
[21] Floyd, Juliet. “The Selves of Philosophical Investigations.” The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Hans Sluga and David G. Stern, 2nd ed., Cambridge UP, 2018, pp. 214–51.
[22] Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle. Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
[23] McGinn, Marie. Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. Routledge, 1997.
[24] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Big Typescript: TS 213. Edited by C. Grant Luckhardt and Maximilian A. E. Aue, Blackwell, 2005.
[25] Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Harvard UP, 1982.
[26] McGinn, Marie. Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. Routledge, 1997.
[27] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, Blackwell, 1980.
[28] Dejnozka, Jan. “The Ontology of the Tractatus and the Investigations.” Wittgenstein-Studien, vol. 6, no. 1, 2015, pp. 1–34.
[29] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Remarks. Edited by Rush Rhees, translated by Raymond Hargreaves and Roger White, Blackwell, 1975.
[30] McDowell, John. “Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following.” Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, edited by Steven H. Holtzman and Christopher M. Leich, Routledge, 1981, pp. 141–62.
[31] Bloor, David. Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. Columbia UP, 1983.
[32] Cavell, Stanley. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford UP, 1979.
[33] Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard UP, 1994.
[34] Haugeland, John. Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Harvard UP, 1998.
[35] Horwich, Paul. Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy. Oxford UP, 2012.
[36] McDowell, John. Mind and World. Harvard UP, 1994.
[37] Heyes, Cressida J., editor. The Grammar of Politics: Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy. Cornell UP, 2003.
[38] Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge UP, 1995.
[39] Mouffe, Chantal. The Democratic Paradox. Verso, 2000.
[40] Zerilli, Linda M. G. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
[41] Biletzki, Anat. (Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein. Kluwer Academic, 2003.
[42] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. On Certainty. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, translated by Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe, Blackwell, 1969.
[43] Read, Rupert. Applying Wittgenstein. Continuum, 2007.
[44] Schönbaumsfeld, Genia. Wittgenstein and the Problem of Other Minds. Continuum, 2007.
[45] Crary, Alice. Beyond Moral Judgment. Harvard UP, 2007.
[46] Read, Rupert. Wittgenstein’s Liberatory Philosophy: Thinking Through His Philosophical Investigations. Routledge, 2021.
[47] Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, MIT Press, 1992, pp. 109–42.
[48] Conant, James, and Cora Diamond. “On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely.” Wittgenstein’s Lasting Significance, edited by Max Kölbel and Bernhard Weiss, Routledge, 2004, pp. 46–99.
[49] Glock, Hans-Johann. “Wittgenstein and Animals.” The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, edited by Oskari Kuusela and Marie McGinn, Oxford UP, 2011, pp. 744–67.
