• editor.aipublications@gmail.com
  • Track Your Paper
  • Contact Us
  • ISSN: 2456-8635

International Journal Of Horticulture, Agriculture And Food Science(IJHAF)

From Adoption to Use: Economic Constraints and Quality of Phytosanitary Product Use among Maize Producers in East Cameroon

Brice Valdaise Nsim , , Eleazar Tchemtchoua , Jassemine Laure Nsoffou , Louis Etoa Etoa


International Journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food science(IJHAF), Vol-10,Issue-3, July - September 2026, Pages 12-19, 10.22161/ijhaf.10.3.2

Download | Downloads : 1 | Total View : 45

Article Info: Received: 07 Aug 2026; Received in revised form: 08 Sep 2026; Accepted: 12 Sep 2026; Available online: 17 Sep 2026

Cite this Article: APA | ACM | Chicago | Harvard | IEEE | MLA | Vancouver | Bibtex

Share

Making a phytosanitary product available to a farmer does not guarantee that its agronomic benefits are realised. This study examines this gap between adoption and effective use among maize producers in East Cameroon during the 2025-2026 season, in a context marked by a decline in maize prices estimated at 75 to 80% since 2018-2019. A survey was conducted among 200 stakeholders (160 maize producers and 40 phytosanitary product retailers) across thirty localities in the Lom-et-Djérem, Haut-Nyong, Kadey and Boumba-et-Ngoko departments between January and March 2026, and analysed using Excel 2019 and SPSS 25 (chi-square, ANOVA, Student's t-test, Pearson correlation, binary logistic regression). The overall adoption rate reaches 82.5% (132 out of 160 producers), but among adopters, just over a third (49 producers, about 37%) apply the products outside the recommended phenological stage. A gap observed in a context of strong liquidity constraints: 94.0% of producers report being strongly affected by the maize price decline and 64.4% have no access to agricultural credit. Average yield rises from 2.20 t/ha among non-adopters to 5.80 t/ha among producers who respected the application stage, against 3.10 t/ha for late adopters, a shortfall estimated at 422,230 CFA francs per farm per season for an average 2.46 ha holding (ANOVA F = 496.36; Student's t = 24.15; Pearson r = 0.621; p < 0.001 for all three). These findings suggest that the main bottleneck is no longer the diffusion of the innovation itself, but producers' economic capacity to acquire it when agronomy requires it. Strengthening extension services should therefore be paired with input-financing mechanisms aligned with the agricultural calendar, such as warrantage and input credit.

Adoption, Extension, phytosanitary, extension, maize, East Cameroon.

[1] Anderson, J. R., & Feder, G. (2007). Agricultural extension. In R. Evenson & P. Pingali (Eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2343-2378). Elsevier.
[2] Arslan, A., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Asfaw, S., & Cattaneo, A. (2022). Adoption and intensity of adoption of agricultural technologies in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 105, 102152.
[3] Banque mondiale. (2024). Cameroon Economic Update. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/cameroon
[4] CIRAD. (2023). Usage et tendances des pesticides en Afrique. Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement.
[5] Davis, K., Babu, S. C., Blom, S., Cling, J.-P., & Marin-Miret, A. (2020). Impact of agricultural extension services on farmer knowledge and productivity. World Development, 125, 104687.
[6] Davis, K., & Sulaiman, R. (2016). The new extensionist: Roles, strategies, and capacities to strengthen extension and advisory services. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 22(3), 211-229.
[7] Day, R., Abrahams, P., Bateman, M., Beale, T., Clottey, V., Cock, M., Colmenarez, Y., Corniani, N., Early, R., Godwin, J., & Gonzalez-Moreno, P. (2017). Fall armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa. Outlooks on Pest Management, 28(5), 196-201.
[8] Ellis, F. (1993). Peasant Economics: Farm Households and Agrarian Development (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[9] FAO. (2019). Pesticide Management and Farmer Training. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture.
[10] Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255-298.
[11] Karlan, D., Osei, R., Osei-Akoto, I., & Udry, C. (2014). Agricultural decisions after relaxing credit and risk constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), 597-652.
[12] Komarek, A. M., De Pinto, A., & Smith, V. H. (2020). A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 178, 102738.
[13] MINADER. (2019). Rapport annuel des activités agricoles au Cameroun. Ministère de l'Agriculture et du Développement Rural.
[14] Ngowi, A. V. F., Mbise, T. J., Ijani, A. S. M., London, L., & Ajayi, O. C. (2007). Smallholder vegetable farmers in northern Tanzania: Pesticides use practices, perceptions, cost and health effects. Crop Protection, 26(11), 1617-1624.
[15] Popp, J., Pető, K., & Nagy, J. (2013). Pesticide productivity and food security: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33(1), 243-255.
[16] Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
[17] Swanson, B. E., & Rajalahti, R. (2010). Strengthening Agricultural Extension and Advisory Systems: Procedures for Assessing, Transforming, and Evaluating Extension Systems. World Bank.
[18] Tabe-Ojong, M. P., Jr., Molua, E. L., Nkemelu, D., & Nziguheba, G. (2023). Agricultural extension services and pesticide use in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3), 678-695.
[19] Williamson, S., Ball, A., & Pretty, J. (2008). Trends in pesticide use and drivers for safer pest management in four African countries. Crop Protection, 27, 132-140.
[20] Wyckhuys, K. A. G., & Wesemael, W. M. L. (2023). Global evolution of integrated pest management research and practice. Biological Control, 179, 105152.
[21] Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. Harper & Row.Aucun autre conflit d'intérêts entre I. S. Jacobs and C. P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G. T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271–350.