• editor.aipublications@gmail.com
  • Track Your Paper
  • Contact Us
  • ISSN: 2456-866X

International Journal Of Chemistry, Mathematics And Physics(IJCMP)

The role of strain rate in the dynamic response of materials

Yehuda Partom


International Journal of Chemistry, Mathematics And Physics(IJCMP), Vol-4,Issue-1, January - February 2020, Pages 9-17 , 10.22161/ijcmp.4.1.3

Download | Downloads : 2 | Total View : 510

Share

We start with the response of ductile materials. To understand the response of these materials to fast dynamic loadings, we introduce two approaches to dynamic viscoplasticity. These are the flowstress approach and the overstress approach, and strain rate has different roles with these two approaches. At very high loading rates the flowstress approach implies very high strength, which is hard to explain by microscale considerations, while the overstress approach does not.We then demonstrate the advantage of using the overstress approach by applying the two approaches to the elastic precursor decay problem. Next use the overstress approach to treat the following problems: 1) the 4th power law response in steady flow of ductile materials; 2) high rate stress upturn (HRSU) of ductile materials; and 3) HRSU of brittle materials. With these examples we demonstrate the advantage of using the overstress approach over the flowstress approach. It follows that HRSU means High (strain) Rate Stress Upturn and not High Rate Strength Upturn, as would follow from using the flowstress approach.

strain rate, ductile materials, HRSU.

[1] M.I. Wilkins, Calculation of Elastic-Plastic Flow. In B. Alder, S. Fernbach and M. Rotenberg, Methods in Computational Physics V. 3, 211-263, Academic Press, New York (1964).
[2] W. Herrmann, in Propagation of Shock Waves in Solids, edited by E. Varley, p. 1 (1976).
[3] W. Herrmann, D.L. Hicks and E.G. Yound, in Shock Waves and the Mechanical Properties of Solids, edited by J.J. Burk and V. Weis. P. 23 (1971).
[4] Y. Partom, Elastic Precursor Decay Calculations, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 2716 (1986).
[5] Y. Partom, Modeling Stress Upturn at High Strain Rates for Ductile Materials, DYMAT 2018 conference proceedings, EPJ web of conferences 183, 01002 (2018).
[6] D.E. Grady, Structured Shock Waves and the 4th Power Law, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 013506 (2010).
[7] L.M. Barker, Behavior of Dense Media under Dynamic Pressure, Gordon and Breech, New York, p. 483 (1968).
[8] W. Band and G.E. Duvall, Am. J. Phys. 29, p. 780 (1961).
[9] P.S. Follansbee and U.F. Kocks, A Constitutive Description of the Deformation of Copper based on the use of the Mechanical Threshold Stress as an Internal State Variable, Acta Metall. 36, 81-93 (1988).
[10] H. Couque, The use of Direct Impact Hopkinson Pressure Bar Technique to describe thermally activated and viscous Drag Regimes of Metallic Materials, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A372, 20130218 (2014).
[11] Z. Rosenberg, R. Kositski, Y. Ashuach, V. Leus and A. Malka-Markovitz, On the upturn phenomenon in the strength vs. strain-rate relations of metals, Int. J. Solids Struct. (in Press).
[12] L. Malvar and C.A. Ross, Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension, ACI Materials Journal 735-739 (1998).
[13] G.R. Johnson, T.J. Holmquist and S.R. Beissel, Response of aluminum nitride to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 1639-1647 (2003).