• editor.aipublications@gmail.com
  • Track Your Paper
  • Contact Us
  • ISSN: 2456-8635 (NAAS Rating: 3.43)

International Journal Of Horticulture, Agriculture And Food Science(IJHAF)

Seasonal abundance and the effect of sowing date on infestation of the pea blue butterfly, Lampedies boeticus L.on cowpeaVigna unguiculata Walp. In Iraq

Hameed H. Al-Karboli , Nuaman H. AL-Janabi


International Journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food science(IJHAF), Vol-1, Issue-3, September - October 2017, Pages 16-20, 10.22161/ijhaf.1.3.4

Download | Downloads : 6 | Total View : 1646

Share

A field experiment was carried out at the College of Agriculture/ University of Baghdad to study the seasonal incidence and effect of the sowing date in the infestation of the pea blue butterfly,Lampiedes boeticus L.Results showed that adults began to appear during the first week of June, where the number of eggs and larvae were 4 and 3 per5 plants respectively, then began to increase gradually to its first peak of 8 and 7 per 5 plants in mid-July. The second peak reached 12 and 9 per 5 plants respectively during the middle of October. The infestation began after about 7 weeks of sowing, with infestation rates reaching 10.93 and 24.83%. As for the summer sowing time, it increased during the months of September, October and November to reach a second peak of 27.33, 38.33 and 29.47%, respectively, and its general rates were less than 18.04% , which significantly different from the spring sowing season. The overall rates of loss during the spring season were 31.88%, which is significantly different from the 26.92% during the summer season. The losses caused by the insect during the spring season are higher. The use of these results in the control program for this pest was discussed.

pea blue butterfly, Lampides boeticus, cowpea , seasonal incidence, Iraq.

[1] Matlub, A. Nasser.1979 . Practical Vegetables.Dar AL-kutub for Printing and Publishing. Iraq,242 p.
[2] Ameta, O.P. and S.C. Bhardwaj .1995. Sesoonal incidence of major insect pest pest of pigeonpea . Indian .J. Applied Entomology, 9:35-41.
[3] Deshmush, A.Y., M.I. Khan and D. Khande .2003. Sesoonal incidence of pigeonpea pod borers under Akola conditions, (Maharashtra), Insect Environment 9 (3) :127-128.
[4] Lagginavar, S.B., K.A. Kulkarni and S. Lingappa .1990. Anoteon sesonal abundance of cowpea pod borer complex , Karnataka jornal of agricultural sciences 3 (3): 272-175.
[5] Lohman, D., Peggie., D.ierce and R.Meier .2008. Phylogeography and genetic diversity of a widespread Old World butterfly, Lampides boeticus(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8(10):1-22
[6] Rathore, H.K., A.K. Vyas., K. S.Ahir, A. Sani and P.Kumar.2017.population dynamics of major insect pest and their correlation with weather parameters in pigonpea ( Cajanus cajan) L. MILL Sp. The Bisscan,12 (1): 1-4 .
[7] Reddy, K.V.S. 1973. Major insect pest of pigeonpea. Ph.D. Thesis.University of Agriculture, science, Bangalore, India. 132 P.
[8] Shantibala, t., S.S. Devi and T.K. Singh .2001. New record of the blue butterfly.Lampides boeticus (Lin) on pulse crops in Manipur, J. of the agriculture science socity of north-east india 14 (1):138-139.
[9] Shantibala,T., S. Subharani, and T.K. Singh .2004. Seasonal incidence of Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus) and influence of weather factors on its abundance on pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. in Manipur Indian Journal of Entomology 66 (3), 198.