[1] Crane, J. M. G., & Hutchens, D. (2008). Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 31(5), 579-587.
[2] Kuusela, P., Jacobsson, B., Hagberg, H., Fadl, H., Lindgren, P., Wesström, J., ... & Valentin, L. (2021). Secondâ€trimester transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length for prediction of preterm birth: a blinded prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 128(2), 195-206.
[3] Lawn, J. E., Davidge, R., Paul, V. K., von Xylander, S., de Graft Johnson, J., Costello, A., ... & Molyneux, L. (2013). Born too soon: care for the preterm baby. Reproductive health, 10(1), 1-19.
[4] Lim, J. U., Lee, J. H., Kim, J. S., Hwang, Y. I., Kim, T. H., Lim, S. Y., ... & Rhee, C. K. (2017). Comparison of World Health Organization and Asia-Pacific body mass index classifications in COPD patients. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 12, 2465.
[5] Matijevic, R., Grgic, O., & Vasilj, O. (2006). Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 85(11), 1342-1347.
[6] McIntosh, J., Feltovich, H., Berghella, V., Manuck, T., & Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM. (2016). The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high-and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 215(3), B2-B7.
[7] Navathe, R., Saccone, G., Villani, M., Knapp, J., Cruz, Y., Boelig, R., ... & Berghella, V. (2019). Decrease in the incidence of threatened preterm labor after implementation of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length universal screening. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 32(11), 1853-1858.
[8] Oskovi Kaplan, Z. A., & Ozgu-Erdinc, A. S. (2018). Prediction of preterm birth: maternal characteristics, ultrasound markers, and biomarkers: an updated overview. Journal of pregnancy, 2018.
[9] Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O, Erkorkmaz U. Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10–14 and 20–24 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. (2007). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 130(2):176-9.
[10] Radhouane, B. J. Nadia, K. Imen, M. Cheour, B. Ines, A. Feirouz,... & N. Khaled (2017).Ultrasound cervical length in predicting preterm birth: Prospective study. Australasian Medical Journal 10(8).
[11] Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008). An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. The Lancet, 371(9608), 261-269.
[12] Tesfalul, M. A., Feuer, S. K., Castillo, E., Coleman-Phox, K., O'Leary, A., & Kuppermann, M. (2021). Patient and provider perspectives on preterm birth risk assessment and communication. Patient Education and Counseling.
[13] Thain, S., Yeo, G. S., Kwek, K., Chern, B., & Tan, K. H. (2020). Spontaneous preterm birth and cervical length in a pregnant Asian population. PloS one, 15(4), e0230125.
[14] Vaisbuch, E., Romero, R., Erez, O., Kusanovic, J. P., Mazakiâ€Tovi, S., Gotsch, F., ... & Hassan, S. S. (2010). Clinical significance of early (< 20 weeks) vs. late (20–24 weeks) detection of sonographic short cervix in asymptomatic women in the midâ€trimester. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 36(4), 471-481.