IJMPD | Isolation of Natural Binding Agent from Barley Seeds and Its Characterization

Indexing and Abstracting

Isolation of Natural Binding Agent from Barley Seeds and Its Characterization

Thakur Hitesh , Thakur Reena , Singla Shivali , Goyal Sachin

International Journal of Medical, Pharmacy and Drug Research(IJMPD), Vol-5,Issue-4, July - August 2021, Pages 9-15 , 10.22161/ijmpd.5.4.2

Download | Downloads : | Total View : 828

Article Info: Received: 20 Jun 2021; Received in revised form: 10 Jul 2021; Accepted: 20 Jul 2021; Available online: 03 Aug 2021

Abstract:

Development of new excipients is time consuming involves tedious procedures and highly expensive. Instead, identification of new uses for the existing substances is relatively and less time consuming. The intention of present study was designed for isolation and characterization of powder from the Hordeumvulgare seeds and explores its use as pharmaceutical binding agent. The barley powder was investigated for purity by carrying out chemical tests for different Phytochemicals constituents and Starch,Flavonoids, Phenol were found to be present. The powder was further characterized for physical and flow properties. Powder has good swelling index 12.7%, PH 6.9, Melting point 134, Moisture absorption 8%, Loss on drying 7.5%. The powder had good flow property as Carr�s Index 15.27, Angle of repose 29.35 and Hausnor�s ratio 1.15. From the study, it indicates that Hordeumvulgare seeds powder has satisfactory pH and physicochemical Properties, which can be used as pharmaceutical Binding agent in formulating various dosage form.

Keywords:

Barley; Binding agent; Flow Properties; Starch.

References:

[1] Thakur Hitesh, Research article on isolationand characterization of powder from Plantagoovata, world journal of pharmaceutical and life sciences 2454-2229.
[2] Ahmed Z, Tetlow IJ, Falk DE, Liu Q, Emes MJ. 2016. Resistant starch content is related to granule size in barley. Cereal Chem 93: 618� 30.
[3] Ajith Kumar A, Andersson R, Christerson T, �man P. 2005. Amylose and ??glucan content of new waxy barleys. Starch 57: 235� 9.
[4] Al?Hakkak J, Al?Hakkak F. 2007. New non?destructive method using gluten to isolate starch from plant materials other than wheat. Starch 59: 117� 24.
[5] Soni A, Raju l.; �A review on natural binding agent�; World of pharmacological research and technology, 2347-2349.
[6] Al?Rabadi GJS, Gilbert RG, Gidley MJ. 2009. Effect of particle size on kinetics of starch digestion in milled barley and sorghum grains by porcine alpha?amylase. J Cereal Sci 50: 198� 204
[7] Baldwin PM. 2001. Starch granule?associated proteins and polypeptides: a review. Starch 53: 475� 503.
[8] Pawar Ashok Harshal; �Recently Investigated Natural Gums and Powders Pharmaceutical Excipients: An Overview�; Pharmaceutics, 2014; 1-9.
[9] www.wjpls.org 120Hemant et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences
[10] Contreras Ignacio, Parra Jonathan; �Modeling of Liquid LiquidExraction Process for Glycerol Purification From Biodiesel Production�; Journal Of Chemistry And Chemical Engineering, 2014; 971-977.
[11] Ahmed Z, Tetlow IJ, Ahmed R, Morell MK, Emes MJ. 2015. Protein�protein interactions among enzymes of starch biosynthesis in high?amylose barley genotypes reveal differential roles of heteromeric enzyme complexes in the synthesis of A and B granules. Plant Sci 233: 95� 106.
[12] Ahmed Z, Tetlow IJ, Falk DE, Liu Q, Emes MJ. 2016. Resistant starch content is related to granule size in barley. Cereal Chem 93: 618� 30.
[13] Ajithkumar A, Andersson R, Christerson T, �man P. 2005. Amylose and ??glucan content of new waxy barleys. Starch 57: 235� 9.
[14] Al?Hakkak J, Al?Hakkak F. 2007. New non?destructive method using gluten to isolate starch from plant materials other than wheat. Starch 59: 117� 24.
[15] Allen T. 2003. Powder sampling and particle size determination. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[16] Anker?Nilssen K, F�rgestad EM, Sahlstr�m S, Uhlen AK. 2006. Interaction between barley cultivars and growth temperature on starch degradation properties measured in vitro. Anim Feed SciTechnol 130: 3� 22.
[17] Ao Z, Jane JL. 2007. Characterization and modeling of the A? and B?granule starches of wheat, triticale, and barley. CarbohydrPolym 67: 46� 55.
[18] Asare EK, Jaiswal S, Maley J, B�ga M, Sammynaiken R, Rossnagel BG, Chibbar RN. 2011. Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem 59: 4743� 54.
[19] Asare EK, B�ga M, Rossnagel BG, Chibbar RN. 2012. Polymorphism in the barley granule bound starch synthase 1 (Gbss1) gene associated with grain starch variant amylose concentration. J Agric Food Chem 60: 10082� 92.
[20] Baik BK, Ullrich SE. 2008. Barley for food: characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. J Cereal Sci 48: 233� 42.
[21] Bello?P�rez LA, Rodr�guez?Ambriz SL, Agama?Acevedo E, Sanchez?Rivera MM. 2009. Solubilization effects on molecular weights of amylose and amylopectins of normal maize and barley starches. Cereal Chem 86: 701� 5.
[22] Bello?P�rez LA, Agama?Acevedo E, Zamudio?Flores PB, Mendez?Montealvo G, Rodriguez?Ambriz SL. 2010a. Effect of low and high acetylation degree in the morphological, physicochemical and structural characteristics of barley starch. LWT?Food SciTechnol 43: 1434� 40.
[23] Bello?P�rez LA, S�nchez?Rivera MM, N��ez?Santiago C, Rodr�guez?Ambriz SL, Rom�n?Gutierrez AD. 2010b. Effect of the pearled in the isolation and the morphological, physicochemical and rheological characteristics of barley starch. CarbohydrPolym 81: 63� 9
[24] Bra?oveanu M, Nem?anu MR. 2014. Behaviour of starch exposed to microwave radiation treatment. Starch 66: 3� 14.