• editor.aipublications@gmail.com
  • Track Your Paper
  • Contact Us
  • ISSN: 2456-8635 (NAAS Rating: 3.43)

International Journal Of Horticulture, Agriculture And Food Science(IJHAF)

Tripartite Sequential classification Sampling Plans tomonitor Tetranychus urticae Pest mite Population through time

Said OUASSAT


International Journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food science(IJHAF), Vol-3,Issue-2, March - April 2019, Pages 51-63, 10.22161/ijhaf.3.2.4

Download | Downloads : 6 | Total View : 1565

Share

The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a tripartite sequential classification sampling plans to monitor pest mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch, 1836) through time.Three tripartite plans using Wald's Sequential Probability Ratio Test based on tally 0 and 5 binomial counts were developedfor use at different times. For each Wald’s plan, three hypotheses were tested and three probabilities (Pdeci; i=1; 2; 3) for making decision were simulated.Tripartite sequential classification sampling plans with tally 0 binomial counts was compared to dichotomous plans repeated every Δt and after 2Δt.Performance of monitoring protocols were studied by monitoring height T. urticae populations with logistic growth. The results showed that tripartite classification reduced from 30 to 40% of the expected bouts than dichotomous sampling plans after Δt and 2Δt days and reduce sampling cots. Monitoring protocol B reduced the probability of intervening and produced more sample bouts and more samples, which resulted in lower expected and 95th percentiles for density at intervention and expected loss compared to protocol A.The use of tripartite classification plan requiredadjustment of the cd2 and cd1 values to accomplish an efficient integrated pest management during growth season.

Sampling, Tetranychus urticae, monitoring protocol, Binomial count, tripartite plan, intervention threshold

[1] Binns, M. R., and Nyrop, J. P. (1992) Sampling Insect Populations for the Purpose of IPM Decision Making. Annual Review of Entomology37, 427–453.
[2] Binns, M. R., Nyrop, J. P., and Van Der Werf, W. (1996) Monitoring Pest Abundance by Cascading Density Classification. American Entomologist42, 113–121.
[3] Chant, D. A. (1959) Observations on Phytoseiidae family. Acarologia1, 11–23.
[4] Coulson, N. R., and Witter, J. A. (1984) ‘Forest Entomology: Ecology and Management’. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[5] Fowler, G., and Lynch, A. (1987) Bibliography of Sequential Sampling Plans in Insect Pest Management Based on Wald’s Sequential Probability Ratio Test. The Great Lakes Entomologist20.
[6] Groves, R. M., and Heeringa, S. G. (2006) Responsive design for household surveys: tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)169, 439–457.
[7] Harcourt, D. G. (1966) Sequential Sampling for the Imported Cabbageworm, Pieris rapae (L.). The Canadian Entomologist98, 741–746.
[8] Krebs, C. J. (2014) Sampling Designs - Random Sampling, Adaptive and Systematic Sampling. In ‘Ecological Methodology’. pp. 262–301. (Benjamin/Cummings.)
[9] Kuno, E. (1991) Sampling and Analysis of Insect Populations. Annual Review of Entomology36, 285–304.
[10] Morris, R. F. (1954) A Sequential Sampling Technique for Spruce Budworm Egg Surveys. Canadian Journal of Zoology32, 302–313.
[11] Morris, R. F. (1960) Sampling Insect Populations. Annual Review of Entomology5, 243–264.
[12] Naranjo, S. E. (2008) Sampling arthropods. In ‘Encyclopedia of Entomology’. pp. 3593–3593. (Capinera, John L.: Arizona. USA.)
[13] Nyrop, J. P. (1988) Spatial Dynamics of an Acarine Predator–Prey System: Typhlodromuspyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Preying on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Environmental Entomology17, 1019–1031.
[14] Nyrop, J. P., and Binns, M. R. (1992) Algorithms for Computing Operating Characteristic and Average Sample Number Functions for Sequential Sampling Plans Based on Binomial Count Models and Revised Plans for European Red Mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Apple. Journal of Economic Entomology85, 1253–1273.
[15] Nyrop, J. P., Binns, M. R., van der Werf, W., and Kovach, J. (1994) Cascading tripartite binomial classification plans to monitor European red mite (Acari,Tetranychidae) through a season; development and evaluation of a new methodology for pest monitoring. Experimental and Applied Acarology18, 123–153.
[16] Southwood, T. R. E. (1978) ‘Ecological methods: with particular reference to the study of insect populations’ 2., rev. ed. (Chapman and Hall [u.a.]: London.)
[17] Sylvester, E. S., and Cox, E. L. (1961) Sequential Plans for Sampling Aphids on Sugar Beets in Kern County, California. Journal of Economic Entomology54, 1080–1085.
[18] Taylor, L. R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature189, 732-735.
[19] Wald, A. (1947) A Note on Regression Analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics18, 586–589.
[20] Wald, A. (1945a) Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics16, 117–186.
[21] Wald, A. (1945b) Statistical Decision Functions Which Minimize the Maximum Risk. Annals of Mathematics46, 265–280.
[22] Water, W. E. (1955) Sequential Sampling in Forest Insect Surveys. Forest. Sci.1, 68–79.