IJHAF | Geographical Analysis of the Challenges and Opportunities Facing Jharkhand's Irrigation Sector

Indexing and Abstracting

Geographical Analysis of the Challenges and Opportunities Facing Jharkhand's Irrigation Sector

Rajkaran Shukla , Surajbhan Singh

International Journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food science(IJHAF), Vol-7,Issue-3, May - June 2023, Pages 1-5, 10.22161/ijhaf.7.3.1

Download | Downloads : | Total View : 374

Article Info: Received: 08 May 2023; Received in revised form: 14 Jun 2023; Accepted: 21 Jun 2023; Available online: 30 Jun 2023

Abstract:

India is a land of rivers having prevalently a farming-based economy. Agriculture is the fundamental supporter of most of the general population in India and water is the most significant contribution to crop generation. The accomplishment of agriculture relies on the sufficiency and timely event of precipitation. Yet, the precipitation in India is frequently meagre, uneven and there is indeed, even all out disappointment in certain districts and during certain periods. Downpour is bound to a couple of months in a year and it shifts from year to year and district to-area which makes enormous pieces of the nation defenceless against drought. In this manner, natural distribution of water is lacking both spatially and transiently. Aside from the distinction in money saving advantage of good irrigation in various mouzas and diverse irrigation systems, the spatial example is likewise uneven at small scale level for example one irrigation framework to another irrigation framework. The Z-Score an incentive if there should be an occurrence of Co-employable RLI (+1.80) scored most astounding which shows the greatest net benefit for boro development. The most minimal score which is seen in the STW (leased) (- 1.42) poor inundated zone shows minimal benefit for boor development.

Keywords:

farming-based, natural, distribution, territory, capital salary

References:

[1] Ram Kumar (2016) – “effect of drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency on brinjal (solanum melongena) cv. Pant samrat”, ISSN: 2277-9655 [Kumar* et al., 5(10): October, 2016] Impact Factor: 4.116 IC™ Value: 3.00 CODEN: IJESS7
[2] Sohoni D.K. (1973) “Benefit Cost Analysis of Agricultural Projects”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 28(4), p.285.
[3] Shashidhara K K and B.S Reddy, “Farmers Perception and Adoption about Changing Climate and its Variability in UKP Area of Karnataka”, Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, Vol-I, Issue-I, Jan 2012.
[4] Ajay K Jha (2016) – “Impact of Irrigation Method on Water Use Efficiency and Productivity of Fodder Crops in Nepal”, Climate 2016, 4, 4; doi:10.3390/cli4010004 www.mdpi.com/journal/climate
[5] Navaneeth B.S, “Performance of Minor Irrigation in Krishna Basin of Karnataka: An Economic Perspective” University of Agriculture Dharwad, for the Award of M.Sc August-2007.
[6] Bala Raju Nikku (2003) “Irrigation Reforms, Institutions and Livelihoods Opportunities and Challenges Case of Andhra Pradesh, South India”, edited by Kanchan Chopra, Hanumantha Rao Ramprasad Senguptha Indian Society for Ecological Economics, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, p. 343.
[7] Navadkar D.S. Birari K.S. and Kasar D.V. (2003), “A Boon for Sustainable Agricultural Development in Maharastra”, Agricultural Situation in India, Vol. LIX, No. 3, June, p.141-145.
[8] Bala Raju Nikku (2003) “Irrigation Reforms, Institutions and Livelihoods Opportunities and Challenges Case of Andhra Pradesh, South India”, edited by Kanchan Chopra, Hanumantha Rao Ramprasad Senguptha Indian Society for Ecological Economics, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, p. 343.
[9] Singh C.J. (2003), “Efficient Use of Water in Canal Command of Punjab”, edited by Kanchan Chopra, Hanumantha Rao Ramprasad Senguptha Indian Society for Ecological Economics, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, p.175.
[10] Sharma, Shyam Sunder Prasad, Managing Water Scarcity and Rural Conflicts in India 2003.
[11] Joshi, P.K, Tewari, L, Jha A.K and Shiyani R.L, Impact of watershed program and people's participation. National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, (NCAP), New-Delhi, India 2003.
[12] Dinesh K. Marothia (2003), “Enhancing Sustainable Management of Water Resource in Agriculture Sector: The Role of Institutions”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.58, No. 3, July-September, pp. 410-414.
[13] Diwan (2003) “Conflict Resolution in Water Sector through Institutional Development” edited Kamata Prasad, ‘Water Resources and Sustainable Development Challenges of 21st Century’, Shipra Publications, Delhi, pp.348-349.
[14] Dinesh Kumar M. (2003), “Demand Management in the Face of Growing Water Scarcity and Conflicts in India Institutional and Policy Alternatives for Future” edited by Kanchan Chopra, Hanumantha Rao Ramprasad Senguptha Indian Society for Ecological Economics, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp.115-124.
[15] Jayanta Bandyopadhyay and Bidisha Mallik (2003), “Ecology and Economics in Sustainable Water Resource Development in India”, edited by Kanchan Chopra, Hanumantha Rao Ramprasad Senguptha Indian Society for Ecological Economics, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp.67-68.
[16] Vayas, V.S. (2003), “India’s Agrarian Structure, Economic Policies and Sustainable Development”, Academic Foundation, New Delhi, pp.102-103.
[17] Verma, A.R., Solanki, S., Policies for Sustainable Watershed Development Programme in Tribal district Dhar of Madhya Pradesh, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 58, No.3, July-Sept. 2003. p.502.