IJFAF | Origin, non-monetary benefits and perspectives of domestication of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Mifi Division of the West Region of Cameroon

Indexing and Abstracting

Origin, non-monetary benefits and perspectives of domestication of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Mifi Division of the West Region of Cameroon

Essouman EPF , Dadem GC , Temgoua LF , Simo DAB

Article Info: Received: 30 Mar 2020; Received in revised form: 02 May 2021; Accepted: 21 May 2021; Available online: 08 Jun 2021

Download | Downloads : 7 | Total View : 1128

Journal : International Journal Of Forest, Animal And Fisheries Research(IJFAF)

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to contribute towards the promotion of NTFPs from various origins by assessing their contribution in sustaining the livelihood of communities in Mifi Division and the domestication potential of some of the NTFP species. The study was carried out in the Mifi Division in the West Region of Cameroon. Respondent were drawn from a cross-section of exploiters and marketers. Data were collected through the administration of semi-structured questionnaires and interview guides as well as direct observations with actors including 65 wholesalers, 150 retailers and 120 households. Data analysis was carried out using Excel 2016 to generate tables and graphs, and ARCGIS 10.1 to generate the map of the areas of origin of NTFPs. Results revealed that 29 species are used in the Division but almost all (28 species) come from areas out of Mifi. Parts used for consumption consist of 36,84% fruits, 36.84% seeds, 10.52% leaves, 5.26% sap, 5.26% mushrooms and 5,26% rhizome while their use for medicinal purposes consist of 42,85% barks, 28.57% fruits, 14.28% seeds and 7.14% leaves and rhizome. In total, species are used as food (46.55%), medicine (36.2%), for construction and furniture (6.89%), packaging (6.89%) and cosmetics (3.44%). NTFPs are becoming increasingly rare, reason for the need of an effective domestication of the most used species. NTFPs mainly Garcinia kola and Tetrapleura tetraptera with higher assets and low constraints can potentially be domesticated in the Mifi Division in order to reduce overexploitation and promote sustainable management of NTFPs in the present context of climate change. There are many favorable conditions including, the need of small financial capital, the interest of inter-community groups and available workforce. Some constraints persist such as the lack of young plants, lack of technical assistance and financial support.

Keywords:

non-timber forest products, livelihood, species origin, domestication.

References:

[1] Adebisi, A.A. A case study of Garcinia kola nut production-to-consumption system in J4 area of Omo forest reserve, South-west Nigeria. In: Sunderland, T. and Ndoye, O. (eds.) Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies of non-timber forest product systems, Volume 2 – Africa, 2004,pp. 115-132. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
[2] Aiyeloja, A. A., & Ajewole, O. I. Non-timber forest products marketing in Nigeria: A case study of Osun state. Educational Research and Reviews, 2006, 1(2), 52-58.
[3] Amang, M. J., Neudjo, R. P., Nwegueh, A., Caspa, R. G., Agodo, M. J. B., Foahom, B., & Woin, N. Issues of non-timber forest products valorization in a community forest in South Cameroon. FOSAS international symposium, November 2015, 11-12
[4] Anderson, J., Benjamin, C., Campbell, B. and Tiveau, D. Forests, poverty and equity in Africa: New perspectives on policy and practice. International Forestry Review2006, 8 (2): 44-53.
[5] Angelsen, A. and Wunder, S. Exploring the forest poverty link: Key concepts, issues and research implications. CIFOR Occasional, 2003,Paper No. 40, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
[6] Arnold, M. and Townson, I. Assessing the potential of forest product activities to contribute to rural incomes in Africa. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives 37, Overseas Development Institute, London, England, 1998.
[7] Arnold, J.E.M. Socio-economic benefits and issues in non-wood forest products use. Report of the International Expert Consultation on Non-wood,1995.
[8] Arnold, J.E.M. and Perez, M.R. Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives? Ecological Economics, 2001, 39 (3): 437-447.
[9] Arnold, M. Clarifying the links between forests and poverty reduction. International Forestry Review,2002, 4(3): 231-233.
[10] Bele, M.Y.; Somorin, O; Sonwa, D.J.; Nkem, J.; Locatelli, B..Climate Change Adaptation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2011, 16(3) : 369-385
[11] Betti, J. L. Plantes utilisées pour soigner le paludisme dans la Réserve du Dja, Cameroun. Revue de Médecines et Pharmacopées Africaines, 2003, 17, 121-130.
[12] Betti. J. L., Caspa. R. G., Ambara. J., & Kourogue, R. L., Ethno-botanical study of plants used for treating malaria in a forest-savanna margin area, East Region, Cameroon. Global J Res. Med. Plants & Indigen. Med., 2013, 2(10), 692-708.
[13] Bukula, S. and Memani, M. Speaking with one voice: The role of small and medium growers’ associations in driving change in the South African forest sector. IIED Small and Medium Forest Enterprise Series No. 17. International Institute for Environment and Development, Edinburgh, UK, 2006.
[14] Campbell, B.M., Jeffrey, S., Kozanayi, W., Luckert, M., Mutamba, M. and Zindi, C. Household Livelihoods in semi-arid regions: options and constraints. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2002.
[15] Caspa1 R. G., Nyambi1 G. N., Mbang Amang J., Mabe1 M. N., Nwegueh A. B. & Foahom B. Socio-economic Benefits of Non-timber Forest Products to the AFCOE2M Communities of Southern Cameroon. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 2020, Vol. 9, No. 3. 9p. Doi:10.5539/sar. v9n3p30.
[16] Caspa, R. G., Tchouamo, I. R., Mate, M. J., & Amang, M. J. Marketing Ricinodendron heudelotii kernels and Gnetum spp. leaves around Lobeke National Park, East Cameroon. Tropicultura, 2018, 36(3), 565-577.
[17] Caspa, R. G., Tchouamo, I. R., Mate Mweru, J. P., & Amang, M. J. The ecological status and uses of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre and Gnetum species around the Lobeke National Park in Cameroon. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 2014, 3(6), 469-480.
[18] Cavendish, W. Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 2000, 28 (11): 1979-2003.
[19] CIFOR. Contributing to African development through forests strategy for engagement in sub-Saharan Africa. Center for International Forestry, Bogor, Indonesia, 2005.
[20] Conventionon Biological Diversity. Sustainable management of non-timber forest resources. Convention on Biological Diversity Technical Serie Report Number 06, 2001. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/ publications/cbd-ts-06.pdf. Accessed on July 23, 2010.
[21] Endamana D., Angu K.A., Akwah G.N, Shepherd G. and Ntumwel B.C. Contribution of non-timber forest products to cash and non-cash income of remote forest communities in Central Africa. International Forestry Review, 2016. Vol.XX(X), 16p.
[22] Ernst, C., Verheggben, A., Mayaux, P., Hansen, M., & Defourny, P. Etat des forêts de l’Afrique Centrale : cartographie du couvert forestier et des changements du couvert forestier en Afrique centrale. Rapport d’évaluation. COMIFAC, 20, 2010.
[23] Eyog, M. O., Ndoye, O., Kengue, J., & Awono, A. Les Fruitiers Forestiers Comestibles du Cameroun. Cotonou, Bénin, IPGRI Regional Office for West and Central Africa, 2006, 204.
[24] FAO. Better forestry, less poverty. A practitioner’s guide. FAO Forestry Paper 149. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2006.
[25] Foodand Agriculture Organization. Non-wood forest products for rural income and sustainable forestry. FAO, 1995, ISBN 92-5-103765-5.
[26] Guedje, N. M. La gestion des populations d'arbres comme outil pour une exploitation durable des produits forestiers non-ligneux : l'exemple de Garcinia lucida (sud-Cameroun), (PhD Thesis). Tropenbos-Cameroon Series 5. Kribi :Tropenbos-Cameroon programme /Brussels : Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2002.
[27] Hirai, M. Agricultural land use, collection and sale of non-timber forest products in the agroforest zone in Southeastern Cameroon. African Study Monographs, Suppl., 2014, 49, 169-202.
[28] Hoare, A. L. The use of non-timber forest products in the Congo basin, constraints and opportunities. Retrieved fromhttp: www.rainforestfoundationuk.org/files/Forest%20Products%20Low%20PDF.pdf, 2007.
[29] Kaimowitz, D. Not by bread alone…forests and rural livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Oksanen, T., PajarI, B. and Tuomasjukka, T. (eds.) Forests in poverty reduction strategies: capturing the potential,2003. pp. 45-63. EFI ProceedingsNo 47. European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland.
[30] Johns, T., & Sthapit, B. R. Biocultural diversity in the sustainability of developing country food systems. Food Nutr Bull,2014, 25(2), 143-155.https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650402500207 Tropenbos-Cameroon Series 5. Kribi: Tropenbos-Cameroon programme / Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles.
[31] Ndogmo Les efforts des Bamilékés de l’Ouest-Cameroun pour adapter leur agriculture l’accumulation démographique et pour sauver leur équilibre alimentaire contre les agressions de l’économie marchande, 2002, 6p.
[32] Nkwatoh, A. F., Labode, P., Iyassa, S. M., Nkwatoh, F. W., Ndumbe, N. L., &Ewane, M. E. Harvesting and marketing of Gnetum species (Engl) in Cameroon and Nigeria. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment,2010, 2(9), 187-193.
[33] Partenariat pour les Forêts du Bassin du Congo (PFBC). Bienvenue à notre nouveau partenaire Réseau Africain de Forêts Modèles (RAFM) [en ligne], 2011. Disponible à http://www.cbfp.org/actualites/items/RAFM_Bienvenu_au_PFBC_F.html [consulté le 30-07-2017].
[34] Peters, C. M. The ecology and management of non-timber forests resources. World Bank Technical Paper Number 322.Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-3619-3 SAS version 9. 0, version for window.
[35] PROFOR. Poverty and forests linkages: a synthesis of six case studies. PROFOR (The Program on Forests)/ World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007.
[36] Raik, D.B. and Decker, D.J. A multisector framework for assessing community-based forest management: lessons from Madagascar. Ecology and Society, 2007,12 (1): 14.
[37] Rico, M.N. Gender, the environment and the sustainability of development. United Nations Economic commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Santiago, Chile, 1998.
[38] Sander, K. and Zeller, M. Protected area management and local benefits – a case study from Madagascar. In: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner, C., Zeller, M., Guhardja, E. and Bidin, A. (eds.) Stability of Tropical Rainforest Margins, 2007, pp. 363-385. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany
[39] Schreckenberg, K. The contribution of shea butter (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertner) to local livelihoods in Benin. In: Sunderland, T. and Ndoye, O. (eds.) Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies of non-timber forest product systems,2004, Volume 2 – Africa, pp. 91-113. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
[40] Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, S.E. Household wealth status and natural resource use in the Kat River valley, South Africa. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57 (2): 306-317.
[41] Shanley, P., Pierce, A. R., Laird, S. A., Binnquist, C. L., &Guariguata, M. R. Fromlifelines to livelihoods: Non-timber Forest Products into the twenty-first century In L. Pancel& M. Kohl (Eds.), Tropical Forestry Handbook.Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41554-8_209-1.
[42] Shanley, P., Pierce, A. R., Laird, S. A., Binnquist, C. L., & Guariguata, M. R. From lifelines to livelihoods: Non-timber Forest Products into the twenty-first century In L. Pancel & M. Kohl (Eds.), Tropical Forestry Handbook. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41554-8_209-1.
[43] Sunderland, T.C.H., Balinga, M.B. and Dione, M.A. The rattan sector of Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea. In: SUNDERLAND, T. and NDOYE, O. (eds.) Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies of non-timber forest product systems, 2004, Volume 2 – Africa, pp. 275-290. Center for International Forestry.
[44] Sunderlin, W.D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R. Santoso, L. and Wunder, S. Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development, 2005, 33 (9): 1383-1402.
[45] Timko J.A., Waeber P.O. and Kozak R.A. The socio-economic contribution of non-timber forest products to rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa: knowledge gaps and new directions. International Forest Review, 2010, Vol. 12(3). 384-394.