IJEBM | Materiality Matrices in the Environmental, Social and Governance Context

Indexing and Abstracting

Materiality Matrices in the Environmental, Social and Governance Context

António Augusto Baptista Rodrigues

International Journal of Engineering, Business And Management(IJEBM), Vol-7,Issue-2, March - April 2023, Pages 17-22 , 10.22161/ijebm.7.2.3

Download | Downloads : 8 | Total View : 475

Article Info: Received: 26 Feb 2023; Received in revised form: 23 Mar 2023; Accepted: 31 Mar 2023; Available online: 07 Apr 2023

Abstract:

Sustainability reports seek to communicate the performance of organizations in the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) dimensions in line with the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations. Since there is no homogeneity of criteria among the various companies, even in the same sector, the several methodologies seeks to establish specific disclosure standards on ESG factors that facilitate communication between companies and investors about relevant and useful information for decisions through the identification of material and immaterial factors for each of the sectors. Information is material if its omission or misstatement influences people's decisions – likewise, information is immaterial if its omission or misstatement makes little or no difference to the decision-making process. In an ESG context, something is defined as material if it is reasonably likely to affect a company's financial condition or operating performance in terms of the impact it has on its value chain. There are two objectives of this study, first, to identify the main ESG factors that impact companies and that are at the heart of a resource-efficient sustainability strategy through the application of the materiality matrix, second, to envision that after this identification, the company it can optimize its strategic orientation and direct internal management in responding to material issues. This is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach, using bibliographical, normative and documental sources. The study made it possible to analyze and conclude on the importance of the correct diagnosis of material and immaterial factors in the elaboration of the materiality matrix in a banking institution with an impact on the value chain and on the real contribution to the objectives of sustainable development.

Keywords:

ESG, Materiality Matrix, Sustainability Report, Sustainable Development Goals, Value Chain.

References:

[1] GRI (2002). Diretrizes para relatórios de sustentabilidade. From https://www.ethos.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/1Vers%C3%A3o-2002.pdf
[2] GRI 101: Foundation (2016). From https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1036/gri-101-foundation-2016.pdf
[3] Dumrose, M., Rink, S., & Eckert, J. (2022). Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating. Finance Research Letters.
[4] Madison, N. & Schiehll, E, (2021). The Effect of Financial Materiality on ESG Performance Assessment. Sustainability,13,3652.
[5] Spitzeck, H. & Árabe H. & Pereira N. (2016). Guia How-to. Matriz de Materialidade.
[6] GRI and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). From https://www.globalreporting.org/media/q10htdar/q-and-a-gri-and-the-esrs.pdf
[7] AA1000 Accountability Principles Standard, (2008). From https://www.accountability.org/static/e3e758d57b6ceac59883d488cd7fc1fb/aa1000as_portuguese.pdf
[8] KPMG (2014). The Essentials of Materiality Assessment. From https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/10/materiality-assessment.pdf
[9] Jonsdottir, B. , Sigurjonsson, T. O. , Johannsdottir, L., & Wendt, S. (2022). Barriers to Using ESG Data for Investment Decisions. Sustainability, 14(9), 5157.
[10] Mckinsey (2021). How companies capture the value of sustainability: Survey findings. From https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/how-companies-capture-the-value-of-sustainability-survey-findings
[11] Guia de Apoio ao Apuramento de Materialidade nas Empresas (2022). From https://bcsdportugal.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/BCSD-Portugal_Guia_Materialidade_final.pdf
[12] Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors (2020). From https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2020-11/Edelman%202020%20Institutional%20Investor%20Trust_FINAL.pdf
[13] ESG and growth: a new way of thinking, PwC (2022). From https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/uk/en/insights/esg.html?WT.mc_id=CT1-PL50-DM2-TR3-LS4-ND30-TTA5-CN_StrategyAnd- ESGArticleStaticImage&trk=public_post-text
[14] Capizzi, V., Gioia, E., Giudici, G., & Tenca, F. (2021). The Divergence of ESG Ratings: an analysis of italian listed companies. Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions, 9(2).
[15] Banco Santander, Relatório de Banca Responsável 2021 (2022). From MATRIZ MATERIALIDADE Relatorio Banco 2021.pdf
[16] Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (2017). SASB Conceptual Framework. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. San Francisco, CA. From www.sasb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/SASB-Conceptual-Framework.pdf?source=post_page