IJCMP | Quantitative Evaluation of Dissociation Mechanisms in Methylorange and Methylred

Indexing and Abstracting

Quantitative Evaluation of Dissociation Mechanisms in Methylorange and Methylred

Toshihiko Hanai

International Journal of Chemistry, Mathematics And Physics(IJCMP), Vol-2,Issue-3, May - June 2018, Pages 23-26 , 10.22161/ijcmp.2.3.1

Download | Downloads : 9 | Total View : 1958

Abstract:

Several computational chemistry programs were evaluated as aids to teaching a part of qualitative analytical chemistry. Computational chemical calculations can predict absorption spectra, thus enabling the modeling of indicator dissociation mechanisms using a personal computer. An updated MNDO program among 51 programs was previously found to be the best predictor to explain the dissociation mechanisms of isobenzofuranones and sulfonephthaleins. Therefore, the further quantitative analysis was performed for methyl-orange and methyl-red. Computational chemical analysis can be used for quantitative explanation of indicator dissociation mechanisms.

Keywords:

Computational chemistry, Dissociation, methylorange, methylred, Spectra.

References:

[1] T. Hanai, Quantitative in silico chromatography; Royal Chemical Society; Cambridge, 2014, pp. 1-338.
[2] W.R. Brode, The determination on hydrogen-ion concentration by a spectrophotometric method and the absorption spectra of certain indicators, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1924,46(3), 581-596.
[3] I.M. Kolthoff, Indicator constants, J. Phys. Chem. 1929, 34(7), 1466-1483.
[4] I.M. Kolthoff, The color changes of sulfonaphthaleins, benzeins, and phthaleins, J. Phys. Chem. 1931, 35 (5), 1433-1447.
[5] I.M. Klotz, The effects of salts and proteins on the spectra of some dyes and indicators, Chemical Review, 1947, 41 (2), 373-399.
[6] Computing across the chemistry curriculum, http://chemed.chem.pitt.edu/ChemEd/ComputingacrosstheChemistryCurriculum.doc
[7] T. Hanai, Quantitative evaluation of dissociation mechanisms in phenolphthalein and the related compounds, J. Comput. Chem. Jpn., 15(1) (2016) 13-21.Doi 10.2477/jccj.2015-0055.
[8] W.P. Anderson, W.D. Edwards, M.C. Zerner, Calculated spectra of hydrated ions of the first transition-metal series, Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 2728-2732.
[9] R.C. Bingham, M.J.S. Dewar, D.H. Lo, Ground states of molecules. XXV. MINDO/3. An improved version of the MINDO semi-empirical SCF-MO method, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1285-1293.
[10] S. Tretiak, A. Saxena, R.L. Martin, A.R. Bishop, CEO/semi-empirical calculations of UV-visible spectra in conjugated molecules, Chemical Physics Letters, 2000, 331, 561-568.
[11] S. Tretiak, V. Chernyak, S. Mukamel, Two-dimentional real-space analysis of optical excitations in acceptor-substituted carotenoids, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11408-11419.
[12] M.J. Dewar, W. Thiel, Ground states of molecules. 39. MNDO results for molecules containing hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 99, 4907-4917.
[13] J.J.P. Stewart, Optimization of parameters for semi-empirical methods V:modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements, J. Mol Model, 2007, 13, 1173-1213.